IDSPS Icon

Loading IDSPS Consortium

Research & Development

Global Models for Industrial R&D

01 / Local Context

Status of Indian R&D

India has some of the best academic institutions in the world. It also has young, energetic, innovative and hardworking faculty. These faculty have been performing world class R&D in selective systems technologies. These areas include:

CMOS devices and circuits for logic and memory

Compound semiconductor devices

MEMS, sensor and microfluidics

Photonic integrated circuits

Hybrid or low–temperature bonding of Cu to Cu

3D stacking with TSV

Advances in etching of non-conductive materials

Electroplating through-glass vias for 3D

Metal-based encapsulation for MEMS and SLID bonding

Packaging of a wide variety of MEMS devices

Stacking of ultra-thin CMOS devices

Transfer of GaN devices onto Cu substrates

A variety of thermal cooling technologies

Device and Package EDA tools

➤ Packaging related educational programs have also been underway at IITH, IIT KGP, IITK, IITB and IISc. These are all foundational world-class R&D and educational programs upon which to build new industry-driven programs proposed here.

➤ Limited infrastructure exists for R&D, particularly at IISc, IITB and IITD for sensor and other devices. This is a great foundation to build upon with the IDSPS program to grow the Indian semiconductor industry.

02 / The R&D Gap

Academic R&D and the “Valley of Death”

Around the world, leading universities excel at advancing scientific knowledge through high-quality academic research. Their work results in top-tier publications, fundamental discoveries and the training of highly skilled graduates. However, only a very small proportion of these academic innovations, typically ~5%, make their way into products or manufacturing lines within a reasonable timeframe. This persistent gap between academic breakthroughs and the technology readiness required by industry is often described as the “valley of death”. It reflects a structural mismatch: universities focus on discovery, while industry needs manufacturable, reliable and scalable technologies that fit into commercial production environments. The skill sets, timelines, incentives and infrastructure required for these two missions are fundamentally different.

ACADEMIC RESEARCH TRL 1-3 Discovery & Basic Science Knowledge Generation VALLEY OF DEATH TRL 4-6 Technology Gap Only ~5% Innovations Reach Production INDUSTRY PRODUCTION TRL 7-9 Products & Manufacturing High-Volume Scale Fragile R&D Transfer Bottleneck

Fig: Academic-Industry R&D Gap “Valley of Death”

03 / The Georgia Tech Model

Industry–Academia Integration Models

To address this challenge, Georgia Tech pioneered a globally recognized and highly successful model of industry-centric R&D that bridges academia and manufacturing. Unlike traditional Centres of Excellences, which primarily involve faculty and students working on academic problems, the Georgia Tech model integrates industry deeply and structurally into the research ecosystem.

As illustrated in the figure below, this approach includes several transformative elements:

GEORGIA TECH & IDSPS MODEL Industry Co-Development 1. Embedded Engineers Companies place engineers on campus for direct R&D 2. Manufacturability Focus on scalable, yieldable technology development 3. Research Faculty PMs Full-time faculty manage technology roadmaps & delivery 4. Pilot Lines & Prototypes Validation at subsystem level before productization 5. Workforce Development Students gain hands-on training on industrial tools & workflows

Fig: Georgia Tech / IDSPS Integrated R&D Model

Element 1
Industry Engineers Embedded on Campus

Companies place their engineers within the university, working daily with faculty and students. This creates a continuous exchange of problems, solutions, and technical insights.

Element 2
Manufacturability as a Core Objective

Research is not limited to conceptual demonstrations. The focus is on developing manufacturable, scalable technologies, supported by process workflows, design rules, quality systems, and pilot-line validation.

Element 3
Full-Time Research Faculty as Program Managers

These faculty members act like technical leads in an industrial R&D organization overseeing technology roadmaps, coordinating multi-partner projects, and driving prototype development toward defined deliverables.

Element 4
Pilot Lines and Prototype Development

Instead of stopping at device demonstrations, the model supports pilot manufacturing, allowing technologies to be validated at the subsystem or system level before industry adoption.

Element 5
Industry-Ready Workforce Development

Students trained in this environment gain experience working with industrial tools, processes, and problems, making them workforce-ready from day one.

This comprehensive integration of academia and industry effectively shortens the development cycle, reduces risk and ensures that ideas can move from research labs to production lines with speed and reliability. It creates a powerful innovation engine where universities contribute not only through knowledge generation, but also through direct technological impact and industrial competitiveness.

Such a model is particularly relevant for India at this critical juncture, as the nation seeks to accelerate its semiconductor and advanced packaging capabilities. Implementing an industry-centric approach similar in spirit to the Georgia Tech model would enable India to systematically overcome the valley of death, build technologies at global standards and rapidly scale its manufacturing ecosystem.

04 / Benchmarks

Global Model Benchmark Comparison

Georgia Tech / IDSPS IMEC ITRI / Fraunhofer SRC
Academic R&D
Mfg. R&D
Educated Workforce
Involvement of Large No of Academics
Industry Co-development
Technical Focus DsPS S PS DPS

✔ Capability Present    ✖ Not Present    ✔ Partially Present    DPS = Design · Packaging · Systems